Table of Contents | ![]() |
UK Commercial General Insurance 2005 - A Comprehensive Guide to the UK Commercial Insurance Market - Detailed analysis of the UK commercial general insurance market encompassing data on GWP, profitability and competitor performances for group accident and health, liability, motor, pecuniary loss, and property sectors.
Product Code: dmfs1819
Price: $4495
Publication Date: 13-Feb-2006
Overview
Introduction
This report analyzes the market's performance across key commercial lines, providing insight into competitor strategies and the major issues affecting the market. Data relating to the evolving dynamics of commercial insurance distribution are also analyzed. Finally, GWP forecasts are presented for the main sectors of the commercial insurance market.
Scope
GWP growth and profitability in the key sectors of the commercial insurance market provides an overview of market performance
Analysis of competitive dynamics, with profiles of the main competitors' market share changes, performance ratios and strategies
Discussion of the key issues shaping the market at the moment, based on Datamonitor interviews with industry executives
GWP forecasts for the total commercial market and its three main sectors, based on Datamonitor's forecast model and in-house industry expertise
Highlights
The impact of the soft cycle on commercial lines is clear, as GWP growth rates in all five sectors slowed down between 2003 and 2004. As a whole, the commercial general insurance market in the UK shrank by almost 1 per cent as the industry descended into the soft cycle phase.
The general insurance market's underwriting profit increased substantially in 2004, largely due to the beneficial effects of benign weather conditions on the overall claims bill.
In 2004 the commercial market consolidated, as the top 10 and middle tier commercial insurers increased their market share at the expense of the remaining smaller players. The increasing consolidation of the commercial insurance market means that the more established players have greater control over price.
Reasons to Purchase
Benchmark your company's performance against your competitors
Develop your future business plans from an informed viewpoint with Datamonitor's GWP forecasts
Understand the key issues shaping the commercial market and its main sectors
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | 3 |
Introduction | 3 |
Market context | 3 |
Market softening was evident as the UK general insurance market shrank in 2004 | 3 |
The general insurance market's underwriting profit increased substantially in 2004, largely due to good performances in property and pecuniary loss | 3 |
Customer focus | 4 |
Broker is still king in the world of commercial lines | 4 |
Mid sized brokers are increasingly a force to be reckoned with | 4 |
Direct selling has grown but carries limited appeal | 4 |
Other issues are currently shaping the commercial distribution arena | 4 |
Competitive dynamics | 5 |
In 2004 the commercial market consolidated, as large and medium sized insurers increased their market share at the expense of the remaining smaller players | 5 |
Eight out of the top ten commercial insurers experienced an increase in the commercial element of their general insurance books | 5 |
Across all lines, variations in profitability metrics were in evidence | 5 |
The future decoded | 6 |
Conditions in the liability, property and motor markets are expected to remain tough in 2006 | 6 |
CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION | 22 |
What is this report about? | 22 |
Who is the target reader? | 23 |
How to use this report | 23 |
CHAPTER 3 MARKET CONTEXT | 24 |
Introduction | 24 |
The general insurance market shrank marginally in 2004 but profitability increased largely due to benign weather conditions | 24 |
Market softening was evident as the UK general insurance market shrank in 2004 | 24 |
Motor and pecuniary loss led the decline | 24 |
Growth in liability and property slowed significantly | 25 |
Accident and health was the sector least affected by the market slowdown | 25 |
Softening premiums across all commercial lines hampered overall growth in 2004 | 26 |
The general insurance market's underwriting profit increased substantially in 2004, largely due to good performances in property and pecuniary loss | 29 |
While GWP growth in major accident and health lines accelerated in 2004, there was a slowdown in the performance of the overall market | 32 |
Premium income from group A&H lines increased by 4.9 per cent in 2004 | 32 |
GWP growth in the group health sector declined from 6.4 per cent in 2003 to 4.5 per cent in 2004 | 34 |
In 2004 the accident and health market recorded an underwriting profit for the fifth consecutive year, however profitability showed a marked decline | 35 |
Lloyd's plays a relatively minor role in UK accident and health | 37 |
Falling rates led to static performance in key liability sectors in 2004 | 38 |
Capital inflows and a difficult pricing environment restricted GWP growth in both public and general and employers' liability | 38 |
Lower outgoings improved the 2004 liability underwriting result, although slower NWP growth kept the market unprofitable | 40 |
Lloyd's of London plays a significant role in liability insurance | 42 |
The private and commercial motor markets shrank in 2004 and underwriting results worsened as soft market conditions took hold | 44 |
Increasing competition and falling premium rates caused GWP to decline in both the commercial and the private motor markets | 44 |
Fleet GWP fell more than commercial vehicle, but the decline in commercial vehicle is more significant as it follows a period of substantial increases | 46 |
The motor market's underwriting losses increased in 2004 due to the poor performance of the private sector | 47 |
The commercial motor market returned an underwriting profit in 2004, but the market has started to turn | 49 |
Lloyd's underwriters have made a strategic shift away from high volume private motor business to focus on less competitive areas of the motor market | 51 |
Pecuniary loss GWP fell in 2004 however the market recorded a very strong underwriting result | 53 |
Pecuniary loss GWP fell in 2004 | 53 |
Pecuniary loss underwriting profit reached £568 million in 2004 | 54 |
Lloyd's accounted for around 9 per cent of the total pecuniary loss market in 2004 | 56 |
Good weather in 2004 allowed for very attractive margins in the property market, but growth has slowed dramatically | 58 |
Increased competition and market correction resulted in substantially slower growth in the property market | 58 |
Continued benign weather conditions caused the property market to achieve an excellent underwriting result in 2004 | 59 |
Strong NWP growth meant the commercial market performed extremely well in 2004, despite increases in total outgoings | 61 |
Lloyd's underwrites over 14 per cent of UK property business | 63 |
CHAPTER 4 CUSTOMER FOCUS | 65 |
Introduction | 65 |
Brokers continue to dominate the sale of commercial lines, but the dynamics within this channel are shifting | 65 |
Independent intermediaries held onto market share in 2005 | 65 |
There has been a shift in market share among the different broker segments | 67 |
Multinational brokers' market share has slipped slightly | 67 |
National brokers are fighting back | 68 |
Superprovincials are primed for steady growth | 68 |
Regional players have seen market share eroded | 68 |
Company staff are not a threat to brokers | 68 |
Tied agents also exert minimal influence on distribution | 69 |
Banks are slowly increasing their share of the distribution market | 69 |
The direct channel has seen rapid growth | 69 |
Retailers and affinity groups are unlikely to be more than bit-part players | 70 |
Retailers are not a credible source of commercial insurance | 70 |
Several important issues are currently affecting the commercial insurance distribution landscape | 70 |
The impact of FSA regulation has preoccupied the commercial insurance industry, and has served to increase the level of consolidation in the broker market | 71 |
Regulation has been a catalyst for consolidation, rather than a direct cause | 71 |
The soft market is likely to restrict the speed of consolidation | 72 |
The expense burden of FSA compliance has not been as great as anticipated, but opinions remain mixed over the benefits of regulation | 73 |
iMarket can revolutionize the way insurance is sold | 73 |
iMarket will bring major cost and service benefits to the industry | 73 |
Brokers must remain mindful of their service responsibilities to get the best out of iMarket | 74 |
The broker network space is almost saturated | 75 |
Willis Commercial Network and The Broker Network have proved highly successful | 75 |
There may only be room for one more large network | 76 |
Demand for self insurance or ART will be dampened by softening market conditions | 77 |
ART is less of a threat to brokers in the soft market | 77 |
CHAPTER 5 COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS | 78 |
Introduction | 78 |
The majority of the top 10 commercial insurers grew their presence in the commercial sector in 2004 with Norwich Union remaining market leader | 78 |
In 2004 the commercial market consolidated, as the top 10 and middle tier commercial insurers increased their market share at the expense of the remaining smaller players | 78 |
Norwich Union is the largest commercial insurer in the UK | 79 |
Nine of the top 10 players increased their market share in 2004 | 80 |
Norwich Union consolidated its position as the number one UK commercial insurer, growing its market share by 1.5 percentage points | 80 |
Brit Insurance boosted its market share by 0.8 percentage points, to become the tenth largest commercial insurance provider | 81 |
Allianz boosted its market share by 0.7 percentage points in 2004 | 81 |
AXA recorded growth of 0.6 per cent in its commercial market share | 81 |
Zurich's share grew by 0.4 percentage points, closing the gap with Royal & SunAlliance slightly | 82 |
New Hampshire increased its market share by 0.3 percentage points to 5.3 per cent | 82 |
NFU Mutual grew its market share by 0.2 percentage points | 82 |
BUPA grew its presence in the group accident and health sector in 2004 | 83 |
NIG recorded a marginal increase in market share of 0.1 percentage points | 83 |
Royal & SunAlliance was the only top 10 player to drop market share in 2004 | 83 |
Three insurers outside the top 10 achieved rapid growth in 2004 | 85 |
Eight out of the top ten commercial insurers experienced an increase in the commercial element of their general insurance books | 87 |
Royal & SunAlliance saw commercial business become more important to its general insurance book after ceasing to underwrite the HBoS household account | 89 |
New Hampshire concentrated on commercial lines in 2004 | 89 |
The proportion of Brit's commercial business increased by 3.0 percentage points | 89 |
AXA saw commercial business become more important to its overall general insurance book in 2004 | 89 |
77.3 per cent of Allianz's GEP was derived from commercial insurance in 2004 | 89 |
Commercial lines accounted for 2.0 percentage points more of NFU Mutual's premium income in comparison with 2003 | 90 |
Norwich Union also achieved larger growth in the commercial than in the personal sector | 90 |
NIG's personal/commercial balance remained almost static | 90 |
BUPA and Zurich FS saw personal business account for a greater proportion of their overall general insurance books | 90 |
Operating conditions in the accident and health sector deteriorated slightly in 2004, as the combined ratio of the top 20 insurers increased | 92 |
The loss ratio of the top 20 accident and health insurers rose by 2.4 percentage points in 2004, due to a deterioration in the health insurance market | 92 |
PMI providers have the highest loss ratios | 92 |
Accident and creditor insurers have lower loss ratios than health insurers | 93 |
UKI and Royal & SunAlliance's accident and health loss ratios saw the biggest increase in 2004 | 93 |
Pinnacle saw the best improvement in accident and health loss ratio in 2004 | 93 |
The top five accident and health insurers all grew their books of business in 2004, with mixed results | 94 |
The expense ratio of the top 20 accident and health insurers improved marginally in 2004, due to big improvements from some players | 96 |
PMI providers have lower expense ratios than creditor insurers | 97 |
Royal & SunAlliance, GEFI and UKI achieved the largest reductions in accident and health expense ratio in 2004 | 97 |
Hamilton, St Andrew's and Lloyds TSB saw their accident and health expense ratio increase the most in 2004 | 97 |
The combined ratio of the top 20 accident and health insurers rose slightly in 2004 | 99 |
GEFI, Royal & SunAlliance, Pinnacle and Norwich Union's accident and health books moved into profitability in 2004 | 100 |
Hamilton's accident and health book moved from a profit to a loss | 100 |
Hard market conditions continued to improve underwriting results in the liability sector in 2004, although it remained difficult to write this business profitably | 102 |
Hardening premiums led to lower loss ratios for the majority of the top 20 liability insurers | 102 |
Over half of large players experienced profitable growth in 2004 | 103 |
Several players experienced double-digit loss ratio improvements in 2004 | 104 |
However, six competitors grew at the expense of worsening loss ratios | 104 |
MMA and Royal & SunAlliance bucked the trend of rising premium income, with differing effects on profitability | 105 |
Liability expense ratios crept up by almost 3 percentage points between 2003 and 2004, due to increased commissions | 106 |
A mixed expense ratio performance is evident across the top five liability players | 107 |
Decreases in absolute operating expenses were rare | 107 |
Despite some improvements, just over half of the top 20 liability insurers are still not generating an underwriting profit | 109 |
ACE and Zurich FS were the star performers in 2004 | 110 |
Other players have work to do | 110 |
While the combined ratio of the 20 largest motor insurers improved in 2004, soft market conditions were in evidence | 113 |
The loss ratio of the top 20 motor insurers fell marginally in 2004, although only 3 of the top 10 players assisted in this trend | 113 |
Mid-sized motor insurers displayed more underwriting discipline in 2004 than those in the top 10 | 113 |
Portfolio rationalization has proved successful for several competitors | 113 |
Conversely, some players have seen loss ratios worsen, while motor books have shrunk | 114 |
GEP growth came at the cost of higher loss ratios for seven of the top 20 players in 2004 | 115 |
Only four players benefited from a concurrent GEP rise and loss ratio improvement in 2004 | 115 |
Expense ratios are rising slightly in the motor sector, as premium rate increases fail to keep pace with operating expenses | 118 |
Three competitors benefited from an improved expense ratio, as they scaled back their motor books in 2004 | 119 |
However, a similar number saw expense ratios rise while their premium income fell | 119 |
Churchill and Highway suffered, with an increase in expense ratio despite premium income growth | 120 |
UKI and Esure see rising costs offset by robust rises in premium income | 120 |
A slight improvement in the combined ratio of the top 20 motor insurers masks a mixed performance and irrefutable signs of market softening | 123 |
Profitability analysis presents a mixed picture for the top 20 motor insurers overall | 123 |
Several players are better placed to tackle softer market conditions than others | 124 |
CIS, Esure and AXA must move towards more profitable underwriting | 124 |
Continued combined ratio improvements for the top 20 pecuniary loss insurers cemented this sector's position as the most profitable general insurance line | 127 |
The loss ratio of the top 20 pecuniary loss insurers fell by 3.5 percentage points in 2004, as premiums once again outstripped claims | 127 |
AXA achieved the biggest cut in loss ratio, due to an expansion in extended warranty business | 128 |
New Hampshire and Royal & SunAlliance achieved big cuts in loss ratio, due to large adjustments for claims in prior years | 128 |
Zurich FS suffered due to an adjustment for claims in prior years | 128 |
Hamilton and Motors Insurance both grew their pecuniary loss books profitably | 129 |
The expense ratio of the top 20 pecuniary loss insurers increased by 0.6 percentage points in 2004 | 132 |
Expense ratios vary widely among pecuniary loss insurers | 132 |
Royal & SunAlliance and Direct Line saw some of the largest reductions in pecuniary loss expense ratio | 132 |
UKI saw the largest increase in pecuniary loss expense ratio in 2004 | 132 |
The combined ratio of the top 20 pecuniary loss insurers fell by 2.8 percentage points in 2004, due to improvements in loss ratio | 134 |
New Hampshire's pecuniary loss combined ratio fell substantially in 2004 | 135 |
Royal & SunAlliance, AXA and Allianz moved from a loss into a profit on their pecuniary loss books | 135 |
London General, St Andrew's and UKI moved from a profit to a loss | 135 |
Property was one of the best performing lines for insurers in 2004, with a combined ratio of well below 100 per cent | 138 |
The loss ratio of the top 20 property insurers fell by over 4 percentage points in 2004, as the market benefited from a benign claims experience and rising premiums | 138 |
Liverpool Victoria and Churchill saw the largest reduction in property loss ratio in 2004 | 138 |
The top 10 insurers led the market in terms of performance | 138 |
Four insurers saw an increase in property loss ratio in 2004 | 139 |
The expense ratio of the top 20 property insurers dropped marginally in 2004, as premium rates outstripped increases in expenses | 141 |
St Andrew's and Hamilton saw the largest drop in property expense ratio in 2004, due to rapidly expanding books of business | 142 |
Norwich Union and Zurich FS also performed well | 142 |
Direct Line experienced higher acquisition costs and administrative expenses | 142 |
Legal & General's home insurance drive pushed up its expense ratio | 143 |
Reinsurance commissions and profit participations drop for Allianz Cornhill | 143 |
CIS and Lloyds TSB are hit by rising administrative expenses | 143 |
The combined ratio of the top 20 property insurers fell by almost 5 percentage points in 2004 | 145 |
Liverpool Victoria, Norwich Union and Lloyds TSB moved from a loss to a profit on their property accounts in 2004 | 146 |
Gresham, AXA and New Hampshire saw their combined ratios increase in what was a favorable market for most insurers | 146 |
Royal & SunAlliance's combined ratio remained the same | 147 |
Composite insurers Allianz and Zurich FS performed well | 147 |
CHAPTER 6 THE FUTURE DECODED | 150 |
Introduction | 150 |
The slowdown in GWP growth that the commercial general insurance industry has witnessed is expected to end, as strong rate increases occur between 2007 and 2008 | 150 |
Slow GWP growth is expected to continue in the group accident and health market, although an uplift after 2007 is anticipated | 152 |
The use of accident and health insurance as an absence management tool will be important in the growth of the sector in 2006 | 152 |
Group accident and health GWP is expected to reach £3.5 billion by 2010 | 154 |
The general liability market is forecast to be worth £10.3 billion in 2010 | 155 |
The soft cycle will impinge on market growth in the next few years | 155 |
Commercial motor GWP growth is expected to pick up in 2007 | 158 |
The pecuniary loss market will grow steadily to reach a value of £7.4 billion in 2010 | 160 |
The main factors behind the growth of pecuniary loss will be legal expenses and fidelity and contract guarantee | 160 |
Pecuniary loss GWP will reach £7.4 billion by 2010 | 161 |
After experiencing a soft cycle commercial property rates will harden and the market will be worth £5.4 billion in 2010 | 163 |
Heavy competition for commercial property risks is forcing down premium rates | 163 |
CHAPTER 7 APPENDIX | 167 |
Supplementary data | 167 |
GEP and performance ratios by competitor | 167 |
Distribution | 167 |
Definitions | 169 |
Definitions of general terms | 169 |
Commercial general insurance | 170 |
Explanatory notes to competitor tables | 173 |
SynThesys Non-Life database | 173 |
Explanatory notes to market total figures | 181 |
Research sources | 181 |
Current publications | 182 |
Future publications | 182 |
Relevant links | 182 |
Datamonitor's custom research capabilities | 182 |
SPP writing team | 184 |
List of Tables | |
Table 1: Total general insurance GWP, by sector, 2000-4 | 26 |
Table 2: Commercial general insurance market premium income and year-on-year growth, split by sector 2000-4 | 28 |
Table 3: Total general insurance underwriting result, by line of business, 1994-2004 | 32 |
Table 4: Accident & health GWP split between individual and group, 2000-4 | 33 |
Table 5: Accident and health GWP by sector, 2000-4 | 35 |
Table 6: Total accident and health underwriting result, 1994-2004 | 36 |
Table 7: Accident and health GWP split between ABI members and Lloyd's / Other, 1994-2004 | 38 |
Table 8: General liability market GWP split between line of business, 2000-4 | 40 |
Table 9: Total general liability underwriting result, 1994-2004 | 42 |
Table 10: General liability GWP split between ABI members and Lloyd's / Other, 1994-2004 | 44 |
Table 11: Motor insurance GWP split between private and commercial business, 2000-4 | 46 |
Table 12: Fleet and commercial vehicle GWP, 2000-4 | 47 |
Table 13: Total motor underwriting account, 2000-4 | 49 |
Table 14: Commercial motor underwriting account, 1994-2004 | 51 |
Table 15: Motor GWP split between ABI members, Lloyd's / Other, 1994-2004 | 53 |
Table 16: Pecuniary loss market GWP by line of business, 2000-4 | 54 |
Table 17: Pecuniary loss underwriting account, 2000-4 | 56 |
Table 18: Pecuniary loss GWP split between ABI members and Lloyd's / Other, 1994-2004 | 58 |
Table 19: Property insurance GWP split between household and commercial business, 2000-4 | 59 |
Table 20: Property underwriting account, 1994-2004 | 61 |
Table 21: Commercial property underwriting result, 1994-2004 | 62 |
Table 22: Property GWP split between ABI members and Lloyd's / Other, 1994-2004 | 64 |
Table 23: Market share of distribution channels in commercial general insurance market, 2002-5 | 67 |
Table 24: Market share of commercial players grouped into top 10, 11-20 and >20, 2001-4 | 79 |
Table 25: Market share and GEP for top 10 commercial insurers 2003-4 | 85 |
Table 26: GEP of selected fastest growing commercial insurers outside top 10, 2002-4 | 87 |
Table 27: Split between commercial and personal business for the top 10 commercial insurers, 2004 | 92 |
Table 28: GEP compared to loss ratio, top 20 A&H insurers, 2003-4 | 96 |
Table 29: Expense ratio of the top 20 A&H insurers, 2003-4 | 99 |
Table 30: GEP compared to combined ratio, top 20 A&H insurers, 2003-4 | 102 |
Table 31: GEP compared to loss ratio, top 20 liability insurers, 2003-4 | 106 |
Table 32: Expense ratios of top 20 liability insurers, 2003-4 | 109 |
Table 33: GEP compared to combined ratio, top 20 liability insurers, 2003-4 | 112 |
Table 34: GEP compared to loss ratio, top 20 motor insurers, 2003-4 | 118 |
Table 35: Expense ratio of the top 20 motor insurers, 2003-4 | 122 |
Table 36: GEP compared to combined ratio, top 20 motor insurers, 2003-4 | 127 |
Table 37: GEP compared to loss ratio, top 20 pecuniary loss insurers, 2003-4 | 131 |
Table 38: Expense ratios of the top 20 pecuniary loss insurers, 2003-4 | 134 |
Table 39: GEP compared to combined ratio, top 20 pecuniary loss insurers, 2003-4 | 137 |
Table 40: GEP compared to loss ratio, top 20 property insurers, 2003-4 | 141 |
Table 41: Expense ratio of the top 20 property insurers, 2003-4 | 145 |
Table 42: GEP compared to combined ratio, top 20 property insurers, 2003-4 | 149 |
Table 43: Forecast commercial general insurance GWP, 2000-10f | 152 |
Table 44: Group accident and health GWP, 2000-10f | 155 |
Table 45: Forecast general liability GWP, 2000-10f | 157 |
Table 46: Commercial motor GWP, 2000-10f | 160 |
Table 47: Pecuniary loss GWP, 2000-10f | 163 |
Table 48: Forecast commercial property GWP, 2000-10f | 166 |
Table 49: Distribution channel splits in commercial lines, 2000-4 | 167 |
Table 50: Total UK general insurance market GWP by sector, 2000-4 | 168 |
Table 51: Methodology for Datamonitor's accident and health premium income splits | 175 |
Table 52: Methodology for Datamonitor's property premium income splits | 179 |
List of Figures | |
Figure 1: The UK insurance market experienced a slowdown or decline across all major lines in 2004 | 25 |
Figure 2: General liability remained the largest commercial sector in 2004 | 27 |
Figure 3: Commercial property has been a consistent strong performer in terms of GWP growth between 2000 and 2004 | 29 |
Figure 4: The underwriting profit of the UK general insurance market increased in 2004 due to strong performances from property and pecuniary loss | 31 |
Figure 5: The individual accident & health sector recorded an increase in the rate of GWP growth in 2004, following a slow 2003 | 33 |
Figure 6: The group health market maintained steady growth in 2004, however GWP growth slowed by 1.9 percentage points | 34 |
Figure 7: A strong underwriting result was achieved in 2004, although A&H profitability has declined in the last two years | 36 |
Figure 8: The majority of accident and health business is underwritten by the company market | 37 |
Figure 9: General liability GWP growth was negligible in 2004 | 40 |
Figure 10: Although still unprofitable, the general liability market saw its best underwriting result for more than a decade | 41 |
Figure 11: Lloyd's of London plays a significant role in liability insurance | 43 |
Figure 12: Both private and commercial motor saw GWP declines in 2004 | 45 |
Figure 13: Both fleet and commercial vehicle saw declines in GWP in 2004 | 47 |
Figure 14: The motor underwriting result deteriorated in 2004 with a loss of £71 million | 48 |
Figure 15: Commercial motor returned an underwriting profit of £117 million | 50 |
Figure 16: The share of the motor market written by Lloyd's, while always relatively small, has declined since 2001 | 52 |
Figure 17: Pecuniary loss GWP fell in 2004 | 54 |
Figure 18: Pecuniary loss made a large underwriting profit in 2004 | 55 |
Figure 19: The majority of pecuniary loss insurance is underwritten by ABI members | 57 |
Figure 20: Growth in the property market was sustained in 2004 | 59 |
Figure 21: Profitability continued to improve in the property market in 2004 | 60 |
Figure 22: The commercial property market was very profitable in 2004 | 62 |
Figure 23: The vast majority of property business is written through the company market | 63 |
Figure 24: The influence of provincial brokers is clearly weakening post-FSA | 66 |
Figure 25: The contraction in the broker population has been precipitated by FSA regulation, but a number of other issues were already driving consolidation | 72 |
Figure 26: The top 10 commercial insurers gained market share in 2004 | 79 |
Figure 27: Norwich Union is the leading commercial general insurer with a 12.6 per cent market share in 2004 | 80 |
Figure 28: Of the top 10 insurers, New Hampshire's commercial market share has increased the most between 2000 and 2004 | 84 |
Figure 29: Aspen, Standard Life and Highway expanded their commercial books rapidly in 2004 | 87 |
Figure 30: Many top 10 commercial insurers saw commercial business grow as a proportion of their overall general insurance books in 2004 | 88 |
Figure 31: Commercial business outweighs personal business for many of the top 10 commercial insurers | 91 |
Figure 32: The majority of the top 20 accident and health insurers suffered a higher loss ratio in 2004 | 95 |
Figure 33: Expense ratios increased for the majority of the top 20 accident and health insurers in 2004 | 98 |
Figure 34: Only four accident and health insurers had a combined ratio above 100 per cent in 2004 | 101 |
Figure 35: Most liability insurers benefited from falling loss ratios on growing books of business in 2004 | 103 |
Figure 36: Expense ratios rose for the majority of the top 20 liability insurers in 2004 | 108 |
Figure 37: Just under half of the top 20 liability insurers achieved underwriting profitability in 2004 | 111 |
Figure 38: Only four of the top 20 motor competitors combined a growing book of business with an improved loss ratio in 2004, highlighting the onset of softening conditions in this sector | 117 |
Figure 39: The majority of large motor insurers saw only a minor change in expense ratio in 2004 | 121 |
Figure 40: Around half of the top 20 motor insurers achieved underwriting profitability in 2004 | 126 |
Figure 41: Many of the top 20 pecuniary loss insurers grew their books in 2004, however, there was a mixed loss ratio experience | 130 |
Figure 42: There was a very mixed expense ratio performance among the top 20 pecuniary loss insurers in 2004 | 133 |
Figure 43: The majority of pecuniary loss insurers recorded a combined ratio below 100 per cent in 2004 | 136 |
Figure 44: The majority of insurers benefited from a benign claims experience in 2004 and reduced their property loss ratios while raising premiums | 140 |
Figure 45: Although expense ratios increased for the majority of the top 20 property insurers, the performance of eight players managed to marginally reduce the expense ratio of this group as a whole | 144 |
Figure 46: The vast majority of the top 20 property insurers achieved underwriting profit in 2004 | 148 |
Figure 47: Across the commercial general insurance industry growth rates are expected to improve by 2008 | 151 |
Figure 48: Key variables affecting the group accident and health market, 2005e-10f | 153 |
Figure 49: The current slowdown in group A&H GWP growth is expected to continue until 2008f | 154 |
Figure 50: Key variables affecting general liability GWP forecasts, 2005e-10f | 156 |
Figure 51: Cyclical volatility will continue to be a feature of the general liability market in future | 157 |
Figure 52: Key variables affecting commercial motor GWP, 2005e-10f | 158 |
Figure 53: Commercial motor GWP is expected to pick up in 2007 | 159 |
Figure 54: Key variables affecting pecuniary loss GWP, 2005-10f | 161 |
Figure 55: Pecuniary loss GWP is forecast to carry on rising between 2005 and 2010 | 162 |
Figure 56: Key variables affecting commercial property GWP, 2005-10f | 164 |
Figure 57: Commercial property GWP will dip between 2004 and 2008 followed by a period of hardening | 165 |
Figure 58: Datamonitor's core consulting capabilities | 183 |
Contact Datamonitor on:
| Datamonitor USA | Datamonitor Europe | Datamonitor Germany | Datamonitor Asia Pacific | Datamonitor Japan |
| 245 Fifth Ave | Charles House | Kastor & Pollux | Darling Park | Wakamatsu Bldg 7F |
| 4th Floor | 108-110 Finchley Road | Platz der Einheit 1 | Tower 2, Level 21 | 3-3-6 Nihonbashi-Honcho |
| New York, NY 10016 | London NW3 5JJ | 60327 Frankfurt | 201 Sussex Street | Chuo-ku |
| USA | United Kingdom | Deutschland | Sydney, NSW 2000 | Tokyo 103-0023 |
| Australia | Japan | |||
| t: +1 212 686 7400 | t: +44 20 7675 7000 | t: +49 69 9750 3119 | t: +61 2 9006 1526 | t: +81 3 6202 7681 |
| f: +1 212 686 2626 | f: +44 20 7675 7500 | f: +49 69 9750 3320 | f: +61 2 9006 1559 | f: +81 3 4512 8117 |
| e: usinfo@datamonitor.com | e: eurinfo@datamonitor.com | e: deinfo@datamonitor.com | e: apinfo@datamonitor.com | e: jpinfo@datamonitor.com |
