Table of Contents

UK Commercial Property Insurance 2006

Product Code: dmfs1868

Price: $4495

Publication Date: 25-Apr-2006


Overview

Introduction

UK Commercial Property Insurance 2006 provides an in-depth analysis of the commercial property market in the UK, analyzing the key trends in premium income, claims and profitability, giving the reader insight into this market.

Scope

Report Highlights

The commercial property insurance market's gross written premiums (GWP) declined in 2005, following a slowdown in premium growth rates in 2004. Growth rates have fallen dramatically in the last two years, from 24.3 per cent in 2003, to only 2.8 per cent in 2004. Most recently, in 2005, it is estimated that GWP declined by 7.4 percentage points.

Commercial property claims costs increased significantly in 2005, following a benign year in 2004. Overall, claims costs rose by 69.1 per cent in 2005, driven by a rise in all perils except theft. Claims costs resulting from fire and weather damage soared, and as a result, business interruption costs also increased.

In 2004, seven of the top ten commercial property insurers increased their market share. Norwich Union, already the largest player in the market, recorded the greatest rise, increasing its market share by 1.9 percentage points in 2004. This placed it 4.7 percentage points ahead of its nearest competitor, Royal & SunAlliance.

Reasons to Purchase


CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3

The commercial property market recorded a strong underwriting profit in 2004, however the market softened in 2005

3

Commercial property GWP declined in 2005 as rates softened

3

The commercial property insurance market recorded a very strong underwriting result in 2004

3

Commercial property claims costs rose sharply in 2005

3

Claims resulting from fire, business interruption and weather damage all increased sharply

3

Fire losses were a major problem for insurers in 2005

4

An explosion at the Buncefield oil depot was a major event

4

Retailer Primark recorded heavy fire losses when a warehouse caught fire in November 2005

4

A blaze at Southampton University caused extensive damage to part of a campus in October 2005

4

Commercial property insurers are concerned by the fire brigade reforms, falling building standards and take up of sprinkler systems

4

As fires caused several large losses in 2005, some insurers have been keen to emphasize the effectiveness of sprinkler systems

4

Commercial property insurers are concerned at some parts of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Service) Order 2005

5

Insurers have also voiced concern at the fact that building standards appear to be falling, while rebuilding costs are in fact steadily rising

5

Climate change is forecast to drive up flood claims in the UK, however the government can take measures to reduce these costs

5

Brokers continue to dominate the sale of commercial lines, but the dynamics within this channel are shifting

6

Company staff are not a threat to brokers

6

Tied agents also exert minimal influence on distribution

6

Banks are slowly increasing their share of the distribution market

6

The direct channel has seen rapid growth

6

Retailers and affinity groups are unlikely to be more than bit-part players

7

In 2004, seven of the top ten commercial property insurers managed to increase their market share

7

Norwich Union gained the most commercial property insurance market share in 2004

7

Performance varied in 2004, as half of the top 10 insurers reduced their commercial property insurance gross claims ratio, and the other half saw it rise

7

In 2006, premium rates will continue to fall, however in 2007, opinion is split over whether rates will begin to recover, or remain in decline

8

Commercial property premium rates are falling

8

CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION

19

What is this report about?

19

Who is the target reader?

19

How to use this report

19

CHAPTER 3 MARKET CONTEXT

21

Introduction

21

The commercial property market recorded a strong underwriting profit in 2004, however the market softened in 2005

21

Commercial property GWP declined in 2005 as rates softened

21

The commercial property insurance market recorded a very strong underwriting result in 2004

23

Commissions and expenses have increased due to broker consolidation and compliance costs

24

The market's claims ratio continued to drop in 2004 as premium income increased and claims incurred fell

25

The expense ratio fell marginally by 0.3 percentage points in 2004

25

The underwriting ratio also improved in 2004

25

Commercial property claims costs rose sharply in 2005

27

Claims resulting from fire, business interruption and weather damage all increased sharply

27

Fire is responsible for the majority of commercial property claims costs

28

Statistics from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister demonstrate that up to 2004, commercial property fires were being brought under control

30

As the number of fires in the UK soared in 2005, more businesses were forced to file interruption claims

32

Commercial property weather claims costs rose sharply in 2005

33

The total cost of theft claims declined in 2005

35

Fire losses were a major problem for insurers in 2005

37

An explosion at the Buncefield oil depot was a major event

37

Retailer Primark recorded heavy fire losses when a warehouse caught fire in November 2005

38

A blaze at Southampton University caused extensive damage to part of a campus in October 2005

38

The presence of asbestos complicated a warehouse fire at Burton in South Derbyshire

39

Commercial property insurers are concerned by the fire brigade reforms, falling building standards and take up of sprinkler systems

39

As fires caused several large losses in 2005, some insurers have been keen to emphasize the effectiveness of sprinkler systems

39

Commercial property insurers are concerned at some parts of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Service) Order 2005

40

Insurers have also voiced concern at the fact that building standards appear to be falling, while rebuilding costs are in fact steadily rising

41

Climate change is forecast to drive up flood claims in the UK, however the government can take measures to reduce these costs

41

The cost of flood related claims could rise 15-fold by 2080, due to the changing climate

42

High demand for property in England means local authorities are being forced to take a soft stance on floodplain building, however in Scotland, a much more disciplined approach prevails

42

In Scotland there is virtually no building on floodplains

42

Maintaining watercourses and improving drainage are key activities that would help prepare for the future

43

However, if action is taken to reduce climate change now, emissions could be reduced significantly

44

Better preparation is needed if insurers are to cope with increasing risks of weather damage

44

CHAPTER 4 DISTRIBUTION

45

Introduction

45

Brokers continue to dominate the sale of commercial lines, but the dynamics within this channel are shifting

45

Independent intermediaries have held on to market share in 2005

45

There has been a shift in market share among the different broker segments

47

Multinational brokers' market share has slipped slightly

47

National brokers are fighting back

48

Superprovincials are primed for steady growth

48

Regional players have seen market share eroded

48

Company staff are not a threat to brokers

48

Tied agents also exert minimal influence on distribution

49

Banks are slowly increasing their share of the distribution market

49

The direct channel has seen rapid growth

51

Direct insurance presents a threat to low volume business

51

However, there is a limit to the effectiveness of selling direct

52

Retailers and affinity groups are unlikely to be more than bit-part players

52

Retailers are not a credible source of commercial insurance

53

Targeting trade associations may prove worthwhile for insurers

53

Insurers are developing their electronic trading platforms

53

Imarket has become more sophisticated but development is still required

53

Some commercial property insurers prefer to offer electronic quotation facilities through their own extranet sites

54

CHAPTER 5 COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS

55

Introduction

55

In 2004, seven of the top ten commercial property insurers managed to increase their market share

55

Norwich Union gained the most commercial property insurance market share in 2004

55

Allianz recorded a 0.7 percentage point increase in market share, and overtook New Hampshire to become the fifth largest commercial property insurer in 2004

55

AXA, NIG, Zurich and NFU gained commercial property insurance market share in 2004

56

AXA displayed promising growth in 2004

56

NIG grew its market share by 0.4 percentage points

56

Zurich increased its market share by 0.3 percentage points, despite concentrating on underwriting rigor

56

NFU Mutual saw its share rise marginally

56

Ecclesiastical's commercial property insurance market share remained static for the third year in a row

57

Royal & SunAlliance, New Hampshire and FM Insurance lost commercial property insurance market share in 2004

57

The top 10 commercial property insurers gained market share from players outside the top 20

60

Lloyd's underwrites over 14 per cent of UK property business

62

The top 10 commercial property insurers experienced mixed results with their gross claims ratio in 2004, however FM Insurance recorded the lowest ratio for the fifth year running

63

FM Insurance recorded the lowest commercial property insurance claims ratio in 2004

63

Performance varied in 2004, as half of the top 10 insurers reduced their commercial property insurance gross claims ratio, and the other half saw it rise

65

Ecclesiastical's claims ratio fell by 6.8 percentage points

65

Allianz recorded strong, profitable growth

66

New Hampshire's gross claims ratio suffered from a big increase in oil and petroleum claims

66

Zurich also saw its claims ratios increase in 2004

66

Towergate's acquisition of Fusion and intense competition in the SME sector have proven to be important competitive issues in the commercial property insurance market

68

Following its acquisition by Towergate, Fusion plans to change its insurance capacity provider

68

The SME sector remains highly competitive as AXA, Norwich Union and Groupama try to defend or grow their share of the commercial property insurance market

69

CHAPTER 6 THE FUTURE DECODED

70

Introduction

70

In 2006, premium rates will continue to fall, however in 2007, opinion is split over whether rates will begin to recover, or remain in decline

70

Commercial property premium rates are falling

70

Pessimistic insurers forecast further rate decreases in 2007, while optimistic insurers forecast rate increases

70

In Scenario 1, a positive outlook is provided in which price-based competition eases and rates increase in 2008

71

GWP is expected to decline until 2008, followed by rating increases between 2008 and 2010

73

Under Scenario 1 the market remains in profit between 2006 and 2010

74

In Scenario 2, a more negative outlook is provided in which the market sees more aggressive competition and underwriting losses

76

Scenario 2 assumes more aggressive competition in 2007 as insurers price keenly in order to win and retain business

76

In Scenario 2, the market moves into an underwriting loss in 2007

79

CHAPTER 7 APPENDIX

82

Definitions

82

Definitions of general terms

82

Explanatory notes to competitor tables

83

SynThesys Non-Life database

83

Current publications

88

Future publications

88

Relevant links

88

Datamonitor's custom research capabilities

89

SPP writing team

90

List of Tables

 

Table 1: Commercial property insurance GWP, 2000-5

22

Table 2: Commercial property insurance underwriting account, 2000-4

24

Table 3: Commercial property claims, expense and underwriting ratio, 2000-4

26

Table 4: Gross incurred commercial property claims by peril, 2001-5

28

Table 5: Gross incurred commercial property claims by proportion, 2001-5

30

Table 6: Number of UK fires, by location, 2000-4

32

Table 7: Cost of business interruption claims by cause, 2001-5

33

Table 8: Commercial property weather claims, 2001-5

34

Table 9: Number of commercial property theft claims, 2001-5

36

Table 10: Average value of commercial property theft claims, 2001-5

36

Table 11: The total cost of theft claims, 2001-5

36

Table 12: Market share of distribution channels in commercial general insurance market, 2002-5

47

Table 13: Market share of the top 10 commercial property insurers, 2000-4

60

Table 14: Market share of the top 10 commercial property insurers compared with those ranked 11-20 and those outside the top 20, 2000-4

61

Table 15: Property GWP split between ABI members and Lloyd's / Other, 1994-2004

63

Table 16: Gross claims ratios of the 10 largest commercial property insurers, 2000-4

65

Table 17: Gross claims ratio and GEP of top 10 commercial property insurers, 2003-4

68

Table 18: Scenario 1: Forecast GWP for the commercial property insurance market, 2000-2010f

74

Table 19: Scenario 1: Forecast underwriting result for the commercial property insurance market, 2005e-2010f

76

Table 20: Scenario 2: Forecast GWP for the commercial property insurance market, 2000-2010f

79

Table 21: Scenario 2: Forecast underwriting result for the commercial property insurance market, 2005e-2010f

81

Table 22: Methodology for Datamonitor's property premium income splits

86

List of Figures

 

Figure 1: Commercial property insurance GWP fell in 2005

22

Figure 2: The commercial property market was very profitable in 2004

23

Figure 3: The commercial property insurance market's claims ratio has fallen steadily since 2000

26

Figure 4: Fire claims rose significantly in 2005

28

Figure 5: Business interruption and weather claims increased as a proportion of total commercial property claims incurred in 2005

29

Figure 6: The number of commercial property fires fell significantly between 2001-4

31

Figure 7: 2005 saw a hike in business interruption claims caused by fire damage

33

Figure 8: Commercial property weather claims increased sharply in 2005

34

Figure 9: 2005 saw a drop in both the number of commercial property theft claims

35

Figure 10: The extent of the damage is revealed at Buncefield, after fires die back

38

Figure 11: The influence of provincial brokers is clearly weakening post-FSA

46

Figure 12: Market leader Norwich Union grew its commercial property book faster than any other top 10 competitor in 2004

58

Figure 13: Norwich Union led the commercial property insurance market in 2004 with a share of 17.7 per cent

59

Figure 14: Larger insurers began to seek more commercial property insurance business in 2004

61

Figure 15: The vast majority of property business is written through the company market

62

Figure 16: FM Insurance's claims ratio was the lowest of any top 10 commercial property insurer in 2004

64

Figure 17: Allianz, Norwich Union and NFU all moved their commercial property books into more profitable territory in 2004

67

Figure 18: Datamonitor estimates of premium rate movements, 2005-7

71

Figure 19: Scenario 1: Key variables affecting commercial property GWP, 2005e-10f

72

Figure 20: Scenario 1: GWP recovers in 2008 and climbs to £5,424 million by 2010

73

Figure 21: Scenario 1: The commercial property insurance market remains in profit between 2006 and 2010

75

Figure 22: Scenario 2: Key variables affecting the commercial property insurance market, 2005e-2010f

77

Figure 23: Scenario 2: Commercial property insurance GWP falls to a low of £4,423 million in 2007

78

Figure 24: Scenario 2: The commercial property insurance underwriting result declines until 2008

80

Figure 25: Datamonitor's core consulting capabilities

90


Contact Datamonitor on:

Datamonitor USADatamonitor EuropeDatamonitor GermanyDatamonitor Asia PacificDatamonitor Japan
245 Fifth AveCharles HouseKastor & PolluxDarling ParkWakamatsu Bldg 7F
4th Floor108-110 Finchley RoadPlatz der Einheit 1Tower 2, Level 213-3-6 Nihonbashi-Honcho
New York, NY 10016London NW3 5JJ60327 Frankfurt201 Sussex StreetChuo-ku
USAUnited KingdomDeutschlandSydney, NSW 2000Tokyo 103-0023
   AustraliaJapan
     
t: +1 212 686 7400t: +44 20 7675 7000t: +49 69 9750 3119t: +61 2 9006 1526t: +81 3 6202 7681
f: +1 212 686 2626f: +44 20 7675 7500f: +49 69 9750 3320f: +61 2 9006 1559f: +81 3 4512 8117
e: usinfo@datamonitor.come: eurinfo@datamonitor.come: deinfo@datamonitor.come: apinfo@datamonitor.come: jpinfo@datamonitor.com

The facts of this report are believed to be correct at the time of publication but cannot be guaranteed. Please note that the findings, conclusions and recommendations that Datamonitor delivers will be based on information gathered in good faith from both primary and secondary sources, whose accuracy we are not always in a position to guarantee. As such Datamonitor can accept no liability whatever for actions taken based on any information that may subsequently prove to be incorrect.

© Datamonitor 25-Apr-2006

This report is a licensed product and is not to be photocopied

www.datamonitor.com