Table of Contents | ![]() |
UK Commercial Property Insurance 2006
Product Code: dmfs1868
Price: $4495
Publication Date: 25-Apr-2006
Overview
Introduction
UK Commercial Property Insurance 2006 provides an in-depth analysis of the commercial property market in the UK, analyzing the key trends in premium income, claims and profitability, giving the reader insight into this market.
Scope
The latest data and market research, including information on GEP, claims costs and climate change
An understanding of developments in the SME sector, using Datamonitor's unique findings on purchasing motivation, distribution and rate movements
Insight into the competitive performance of the market and an in depth look at changes in the market share and ratios of its top ten insurers
Two scenarios forecasting the market's GWP growth until 2010, based on primary research and in-house expertise
Report Highlights
The commercial property insurance market's gross written premiums (GWP) declined in 2005, following a slowdown in premium growth rates in 2004. Growth rates have fallen dramatically in the last two years, from 24.3 per cent in 2003, to only 2.8 per cent in 2004. Most recently, in 2005, it is estimated that GWP declined by 7.4 percentage points.
Commercial property claims costs increased significantly in 2005, following a benign year in 2004. Overall, claims costs rose by 69.1 per cent in 2005, driven by a rise in all perils except theft. Claims costs resulting from fire and weather damage soared, and as a result, business interruption costs also increased.
In 2004, seven of the top ten commercial property insurers increased their market share. Norwich Union, already the largest player in the market, recorded the greatest rise, increasing its market share by 1.9 percentage points in 2004. This placed it 4.7 percentage points ahead of its nearest competitor, Royal & SunAlliance.
Reasons to Purchase
Benchmark your performance against other players in this increasingly competitive market
Understand the changing attitudes and expectations of SME commercial property insurance consumers
Develop your future commercial property strategy using Datamonitor's unique forecasts
CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | 3 |
The commercial property market recorded a strong underwriting profit in 2004, however the market softened in 2005 | 3 |
Commercial property GWP declined in 2005 as rates softened | 3 |
The commercial property insurance market recorded a very strong underwriting result in 2004 | 3 |
Commercial property claims costs rose sharply in 2005 | 3 |
Claims resulting from fire, business interruption and weather damage all increased sharply | 3 |
Fire losses were a major problem for insurers in 2005 | 4 |
An explosion at the Buncefield oil depot was a major event | 4 |
Retailer Primark recorded heavy fire losses when a warehouse caught fire in November 2005 | 4 |
A blaze at Southampton University caused extensive damage to part of a campus in October 2005 | 4 |
Commercial property insurers are concerned by the fire brigade reforms, falling building standards and take up of sprinkler systems | 4 |
As fires caused several large losses in 2005, some insurers have been keen to emphasize the effectiveness of sprinkler systems | 4 |
Commercial property insurers are concerned at some parts of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Service) Order 2005 | 5 |
Insurers have also voiced concern at the fact that building standards appear to be falling, while rebuilding costs are in fact steadily rising | 5 |
Climate change is forecast to drive up flood claims in the UK, however the government can take measures to reduce these costs | 5 |
Brokers continue to dominate the sale of commercial lines, but the dynamics within this channel are shifting | 6 |
Company staff are not a threat to brokers | 6 |
Tied agents also exert minimal influence on distribution | 6 |
Banks are slowly increasing their share of the distribution market | 6 |
The direct channel has seen rapid growth | 6 |
Retailers and affinity groups are unlikely to be more than bit-part players | 7 |
In 2004, seven of the top ten commercial property insurers managed to increase their market share | 7 |
Norwich Union gained the most commercial property insurance market share in 2004 | 7 |
Performance varied in 2004, as half of the top 10 insurers reduced their commercial property insurance gross claims ratio, and the other half saw it rise | 7 |
In 2006, premium rates will continue to fall, however in 2007, opinion is split over whether rates will begin to recover, or remain in decline | 8 |
Commercial property premium rates are falling | 8 |
CHAPTER 2 INTRODUCTION | 19 |
What is this report about? | 19 |
Who is the target reader? | 19 |
How to use this report | 19 |
CHAPTER 3 MARKET CONTEXT | 21 |
Introduction | 21 |
The commercial property market recorded a strong underwriting profit in 2004, however the market softened in 2005 | 21 |
Commercial property GWP declined in 2005 as rates softened | 21 |
The commercial property insurance market recorded a very strong underwriting result in 2004 | 23 |
Commissions and expenses have increased due to broker consolidation and compliance costs | 24 |
The market's claims ratio continued to drop in 2004 as premium income increased and claims incurred fell | 25 |
The expense ratio fell marginally by 0.3 percentage points in 2004 | 25 |
The underwriting ratio also improved in 2004 | 25 |
Commercial property claims costs rose sharply in 2005 | 27 |
Claims resulting from fire, business interruption and weather damage all increased sharply | 27 |
Fire is responsible for the majority of commercial property claims costs | 28 |
Statistics from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister demonstrate that up to 2004, commercial property fires were being brought under control | 30 |
As the number of fires in the UK soared in 2005, more businesses were forced to file interruption claims | 32 |
Commercial property weather claims costs rose sharply in 2005 | 33 |
The total cost of theft claims declined in 2005 | 35 |
Fire losses were a major problem for insurers in 2005 | 37 |
An explosion at the Buncefield oil depot was a major event | 37 |
Retailer Primark recorded heavy fire losses when a warehouse caught fire in November 2005 | 38 |
A blaze at Southampton University caused extensive damage to part of a campus in October 2005 | 38 |
The presence of asbestos complicated a warehouse fire at Burton in South Derbyshire | 39 |
Commercial property insurers are concerned by the fire brigade reforms, falling building standards and take up of sprinkler systems | 39 |
As fires caused several large losses in 2005, some insurers have been keen to emphasize the effectiveness of sprinkler systems | 39 |
Commercial property insurers are concerned at some parts of the Regulatory Reform (Fire Service) Order 2005 | 40 |
Insurers have also voiced concern at the fact that building standards appear to be falling, while rebuilding costs are in fact steadily rising | 41 |
Climate change is forecast to drive up flood claims in the UK, however the government can take measures to reduce these costs | 41 |
The cost of flood related claims could rise 15-fold by 2080, due to the changing climate | 42 |
High demand for property in England means local authorities are being forced to take a soft stance on floodplain building, however in Scotland, a much more disciplined approach prevails | 42 |
In Scotland there is virtually no building on floodplains | 42 |
Maintaining watercourses and improving drainage are key activities that would help prepare for the future | 43 |
However, if action is taken to reduce climate change now, emissions could be reduced significantly | 44 |
Better preparation is needed if insurers are to cope with increasing risks of weather damage | 44 |
CHAPTER 4 DISTRIBUTION | 45 |
Introduction | 45 |
Brokers continue to dominate the sale of commercial lines, but the dynamics within this channel are shifting | 45 |
Independent intermediaries have held on to market share in 2005 | 45 |
There has been a shift in market share among the different broker segments | 47 |
Multinational brokers' market share has slipped slightly | 47 |
National brokers are fighting back | 48 |
Superprovincials are primed for steady growth | 48 |
Regional players have seen market share eroded | 48 |
Company staff are not a threat to brokers | 48 |
Tied agents also exert minimal influence on distribution | 49 |
Banks are slowly increasing their share of the distribution market | 49 |
The direct channel has seen rapid growth | 51 |
Direct insurance presents a threat to low volume business | 51 |
However, there is a limit to the effectiveness of selling direct | 52 |
Retailers and affinity groups are unlikely to be more than bit-part players | 52 |
Retailers are not a credible source of commercial insurance | 53 |
Targeting trade associations may prove worthwhile for insurers | 53 |
Insurers are developing their electronic trading platforms | 53 |
Imarket has become more sophisticated but development is still required | 53 |
Some commercial property insurers prefer to offer electronic quotation facilities through their own extranet sites | 54 |
CHAPTER 5 COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS | 55 |
Introduction | 55 |
In 2004, seven of the top ten commercial property insurers managed to increase their market share | 55 |
Norwich Union gained the most commercial property insurance market share in 2004 | 55 |
Allianz recorded a 0.7 percentage point increase in market share, and overtook New Hampshire to become the fifth largest commercial property insurer in 2004 | 55 |
AXA, NIG, Zurich and NFU gained commercial property insurance market share in 2004 | 56 |
AXA displayed promising growth in 2004 | 56 |
NIG grew its market share by 0.4 percentage points | 56 |
Zurich increased its market share by 0.3 percentage points, despite concentrating on underwriting rigor | 56 |
NFU Mutual saw its share rise marginally | 56 |
Ecclesiastical's commercial property insurance market share remained static for the third year in a row | 57 |
Royal & SunAlliance, New Hampshire and FM Insurance lost commercial property insurance market share in 2004 | 57 |
The top 10 commercial property insurers gained market share from players outside the top 20 | 60 |
Lloyd's underwrites over 14 per cent of UK property business | 62 |
The top 10 commercial property insurers experienced mixed results with their gross claims ratio in 2004, however FM Insurance recorded the lowest ratio for the fifth year running | 63 |
FM Insurance recorded the lowest commercial property insurance claims ratio in 2004 | 63 |
Performance varied in 2004, as half of the top 10 insurers reduced their commercial property insurance gross claims ratio, and the other half saw it rise | 65 |
Ecclesiastical's claims ratio fell by 6.8 percentage points | 65 |
Allianz recorded strong, profitable growth | 66 |
New Hampshire's gross claims ratio suffered from a big increase in oil and petroleum claims | 66 |
Zurich also saw its claims ratios increase in 2004 | 66 |
Towergate's acquisition of Fusion and intense competition in the SME sector have proven to be important competitive issues in the commercial property insurance market | 68 |
Following its acquisition by Towergate, Fusion plans to change its insurance capacity provider | 68 |
The SME sector remains highly competitive as AXA, Norwich Union and Groupama try to defend or grow their share of the commercial property insurance market | 69 |
CHAPTER 6 THE FUTURE DECODED | 70 |
Introduction | 70 |
In 2006, premium rates will continue to fall, however in 2007, opinion is split over whether rates will begin to recover, or remain in decline | 70 |
Commercial property premium rates are falling | 70 |
Pessimistic insurers forecast further rate decreases in 2007, while optimistic insurers forecast rate increases | 70 |
In Scenario 1, a positive outlook is provided in which price-based competition eases and rates increase in 2008 | 71 |
GWP is expected to decline until 2008, followed by rating increases between 2008 and 2010 | 73 |
Under Scenario 1 the market remains in profit between 2006 and 2010 | 74 |
In Scenario 2, a more negative outlook is provided in which the market sees more aggressive competition and underwriting losses | 76 |
Scenario 2 assumes more aggressive competition in 2007 as insurers price keenly in order to win and retain business | 76 |
In Scenario 2, the market moves into an underwriting loss in 2007 | 79 |
CHAPTER 7 APPENDIX | 82 |
Definitions | 82 |
Definitions of general terms | 82 |
Explanatory notes to competitor tables | 83 |
SynThesys Non-Life database | 83 |
Current publications | 88 |
Future publications | 88 |
Relevant links | 88 |
Datamonitor's custom research capabilities | 89 |
SPP writing team | 90 |
List of Tables | |
Table 1: Commercial property insurance GWP, 2000-5 | 22 |
Table 2: Commercial property insurance underwriting account, 2000-4 | 24 |
Table 3: Commercial property claims, expense and underwriting ratio, 2000-4 | 26 |
Table 4: Gross incurred commercial property claims by peril, 2001-5 | 28 |
Table 5: Gross incurred commercial property claims by proportion, 2001-5 | 30 |
Table 6: Number of UK fires, by location, 2000-4 | 32 |
Table 7: Cost of business interruption claims by cause, 2001-5 | 33 |
Table 8: Commercial property weather claims, 2001-5 | 34 |
Table 9: Number of commercial property theft claims, 2001-5 | 36 |
Table 10: Average value of commercial property theft claims, 2001-5 | 36 |
Table 11: The total cost of theft claims, 2001-5 | 36 |
Table 12: Market share of distribution channels in commercial general insurance market, 2002-5 | 47 |
Table 13: Market share of the top 10 commercial property insurers, 2000-4 | 60 |
Table 14: Market share of the top 10 commercial property insurers compared with those ranked 11-20 and those outside the top 20, 2000-4 | 61 |
Table 15: Property GWP split between ABI members and Lloyd's / Other, 1994-2004 | 63 |
Table 16: Gross claims ratios of the 10 largest commercial property insurers, 2000-4 | 65 |
Table 17: Gross claims ratio and GEP of top 10 commercial property insurers, 2003-4 | 68 |
Table 18: Scenario 1: Forecast GWP for the commercial property insurance market, 2000-2010f | 74 |
Table 19: Scenario 1: Forecast underwriting result for the commercial property insurance market, 2005e-2010f | 76 |
Table 20: Scenario 2: Forecast GWP for the commercial property insurance market, 2000-2010f | 79 |
Table 21: Scenario 2: Forecast underwriting result for the commercial property insurance market, 2005e-2010f | 81 |
Table 22: Methodology for Datamonitor's property premium income splits | 86 |
List of Figures | |
Figure 1: Commercial property insurance GWP fell in 2005 | 22 |
Figure 2: The commercial property market was very profitable in 2004 | 23 |
Figure 3: The commercial property insurance market's claims ratio has fallen steadily since 2000 | 26 |
Figure 4: Fire claims rose significantly in 2005 | 28 |
Figure 5: Business interruption and weather claims increased as a proportion of total commercial property claims incurred in 2005 | 29 |
Figure 6: The number of commercial property fires fell significantly between 2001-4 | 31 |
Figure 7: 2005 saw a hike in business interruption claims caused by fire damage | 33 |
Figure 8: Commercial property weather claims increased sharply in 2005 | 34 |
Figure 9: 2005 saw a drop in both the number of commercial property theft claims | 35 |
Figure 10: The extent of the damage is revealed at Buncefield, after fires die back | 38 |
Figure 11: The influence of provincial brokers is clearly weakening post-FSA | 46 |
Figure 12: Market leader Norwich Union grew its commercial property book faster than any other top 10 competitor in 2004 | 58 |
Figure 13: Norwich Union led the commercial property insurance market in 2004 with a share of 17.7 per cent | 59 |
Figure 14: Larger insurers began to seek more commercial property insurance business in 2004 | 61 |
Figure 15: The vast majority of property business is written through the company market | 62 |
Figure 16: FM Insurance's claims ratio was the lowest of any top 10 commercial property insurer in 2004 | 64 |
Figure 17: Allianz, Norwich Union and NFU all moved their commercial property books into more profitable territory in 2004 | 67 |
Figure 18: Datamonitor estimates of premium rate movements, 2005-7 | 71 |
Figure 19: Scenario 1: Key variables affecting commercial property GWP, 2005e-10f | 72 |
Figure 20: Scenario 1: GWP recovers in 2008 and climbs to £5,424 million by 2010 | 73 |
Figure 21: Scenario 1: The commercial property insurance market remains in profit between 2006 and 2010 | 75 |
Figure 22: Scenario 2: Key variables affecting the commercial property insurance market, 2005e-2010f | 77 |
Figure 23: Scenario 2: Commercial property insurance GWP falls to a low of £4,423 million in 2007 | 78 |
Figure 24: Scenario 2: The commercial property insurance underwriting result declines until 2008 | 80 |
Figure 25: Datamonitor's core consulting capabilities | 90 |
Contact Datamonitor on:
| Datamonitor USA | Datamonitor Europe | Datamonitor Germany | Datamonitor Asia Pacific | Datamonitor Japan |
| 245 Fifth Ave | Charles House | Kastor & Pollux | Darling Park | Wakamatsu Bldg 7F |
| 4th Floor | 108-110 Finchley Road | Platz der Einheit 1 | Tower 2, Level 21 | 3-3-6 Nihonbashi-Honcho |
| New York, NY 10016 | London NW3 5JJ | 60327 Frankfurt | 201 Sussex Street | Chuo-ku |
| USA | United Kingdom | Deutschland | Sydney, NSW 2000 | Tokyo 103-0023 |
| Australia | Japan | |||
| t: +1 212 686 7400 | t: +44 20 7675 7000 | t: +49 69 9750 3119 | t: +61 2 9006 1526 | t: +81 3 6202 7681 |
| f: +1 212 686 2626 | f: +44 20 7675 7500 | f: +49 69 9750 3320 | f: +61 2 9006 1559 | f: +81 3 4512 8117 |
| e: usinfo@datamonitor.com | e: eurinfo@datamonitor.com | e: deinfo@datamonitor.com | e: apinfo@datamonitor.com | e: jpinfo@datamonitor.com |
